Jacob RENTMEESTER v. NIKE, Inc. No. 15-35509 Decided February 27, 2018. 01 Before: Marsha S. Berzon, Paul J. Watford, and John
Cody Hoesly (OSB No. 052860) choesly@larkinsvacura.com LARKINS VACURA LLP 121 SW Morrison Street, Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97
![US Supreme Court rejects request to hear 'Jumpman' copyright suit against Nike: Digital Photography Review US Supreme Court rejects request to hear 'Jumpman' copyright suit against Nike: Digital Photography Review](https://g3.img-dpreview.com/27CFD223C01149498C3C4D61BC2A35EB.jpg)
US Supreme Court rejects request to hear 'Jumpman' copyright suit against Nike: Digital Photography Review
![Surpeme Court Rejects Photographer Jacobus Rentmeester's 'Jumpman' Lawsuit Against Nike - Sports Gossip Surpeme Court Rejects Photographer Jacobus Rentmeester's 'Jumpman' Lawsuit Against Nike - Sports Gossip](https://i0.wp.com/www.sportsgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/raudu-1.jpg?resize=1280%2C640&ssl=1)
Surpeme Court Rejects Photographer Jacobus Rentmeester's 'Jumpman' Lawsuit Against Nike - Sports Gossip
Rentmeester v. Nike, Inc. – “Jumpman” may be falling down to Earth After waiting almost thirty years, a photographer now
Cody Hoesly (OSB No. 052860) choesly@larkinsvacura.com LARKINS VACURA LLP 121 SW Morrison Street, Suite 700 Portland, Oregon 97
![Nike Prevails In Copyright Case As SCOTUS Rejects Review Of 'Jumpman' Logo - Above the LawAbove the Law Nike Prevails In Copyright Case As SCOTUS Rejects Review Of 'Jumpman' Logo - Above the LawAbove the Law](https://abovethelaw.com/uploads/2019/03/nike-jumpman-logo-GettyImages-535931815.jpg)